Skip to content


Ten Things You Did Not Know About Patents

There are very few things people have heard more, but know less, about than patents. Nearly every infomercial touts its product as “patented” or “patent pending,” but what does that mean? Are patents easy to get? If you change 25 percent of the invention, can you avoid infringing a patent? When is a patent “pending”?

blackberry1
Misinformation abounds when it comes to patents. While facts about patents would fill volumes, here are few interesting facts about patents you can use to regale your geeky relatives over the holidays:

10. You can keyword search millions of patents on Google Patent Search for free.

9. Patents expire 20 years after you file your application. Patent terms used to be 17 years from the date the patent issued. Some inventors, however, were intentionally dragging their feet, waiting until someone else brought their technology to market before having their submarine patents issue. Now, if you drag your feet for 19 years, your patent will only be valid for 1 year.

8. You must pay the Patent Office “maintenance fees” to keep your patents in force. Failure to pay these fees due at three and a half, seven and a half, and eleven and a half years from the date the patent is granted will cause your patent to become abandoned.

7. No patent search is 100 percent effective. Even if you searched all 7 million plus patents, patent applications are kept confidential for at least 18 months after filing. Theoretically someone else’s patent could issue on your invention the day after your searched every published patent and patent application.

6. On average, your patent application will be pending nearly three years. This is not all bad though. Although you enforcement rights are severely limited while the patent is pending, having a competitor build up a demand for your product before the patent issues can be a very profitable turn of events.

5. There is no such thing as a “Poor Man’s Patent.” Relying on a letter you mailed yourself to protect your invention actually provides no protection whatsoever.

4. Just because you have a patent, does not necessarily mean your invention is valuable. Inventors have succeeded in obtaining patents on some pretty wacky inventions.

3. If your invention cannot be “reverse engineered” a trade secret may be a cheaper, easier and longer lasting alternative to a patent.

2. Ordinary attorneys are not allowed to draft patents for clients. To become a patent attorney, you have to have an undergraduate degree in a science, or the equivalent, and have passed the notoriously challenging patent bar exam. No two patents, or patent attorneys, are created equal. It would be extremely unlikely two patent attorneys would draft identical patent applications covering a given
invention. The patent attorney’s experience, and skill and knowledge of the field of art, all factor into whether the patent will be broad and enforceable or narrow and easily invalidated.

1. A patent does not give you the right to make your invention. Your patent merely gives you the right to prevent others from making your invention. The United States Patent and Trademark Office will grant patents on inventions which are improvements on other patented inventions. A patent in hand notwithstanding, if your invention infringes on a valid patent, you cannot make your invention absent a license agreement from the other patent holder.

Brett Trout

Related posts

Posted in Patent Law. Tagged with , , .

Defamation 2.0

Defamation

Defamation is defined by state laws, which vary from state to state. Generally, defamation is defined as a false, published statement, which harms someone’s reputation. It is these three elements: Falsity, Publication and Harm, which qualify a statement as defamatory. Written defamatory statements are referred to as Libel, and spoken defamatory statements are referred to as Slander. While online and offline defamation are treated the same there are a few subtleties to online defamation that do not directly apply to offline defamation. To appreciate these subtleties, it is important to understand defamation in general.
angry_yell

Publication

Publication simply means that the statement was understood by a third party other than the defamer or the defamed. It only takes one other person to understand the statement to find liability. If the person alleging defamation is the one relaying the false statement to the third party, however, that does not constitute publication. “Qualified” and “Absolute” privileges prevent certain kinds of statements from being defamatory publications. In certain instances, these privileges allow a lawyer to make statements in the context of a court proceeding or a crime victim to make a statement to a police officer without being found liable for defamation.

Opinions

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution grants an “opinion privilege.” While the opinion privilege carves out wide protection, simply adding “It is my opinion that . . .” in front of an otherwise defamatory statement does not insulate the defamer from liability. The privilege protects only two types of speech: 1) that which is not “capable” of being proven false; and 2) that which cannot reasonably be “interpreted as stating actual facts” about the plaintiff. Continued…

Related posts

Posted in Uncategorized. Tagged with , , , , .

Can you resell your MP3s?

Under the “First Sale” doctrine, you can resell copyrighted material, such as books, CDs and DVDs without violating US copyright law. But what about MP3s? While copyright law appears to give you the right to resell legitimately purchased MP3s, according to a recent post on ARS Technica , it does not seem to allow you to “copy” those MP3s. So how do you sell a used MP3?
cd_dvd_small_bright
Bopaboo, a self described “social commerce club,” is determined to be the Mecca of used MP3 buying and selling. While Bopaboo is currently in beta, it looks to launch in 2009. While Bopaboo’s model seems to require copying of copyrighted MP3s onto its website, Bopaboo’s fate might be determined more by the size of industry it seeks to undermine, rather than by the subtleties of copyright law.

Markets for “used” virtual goods have been around for more than a decade. Markets for “used” digital music, movies and software are sure to come. Virtual used markets have the potential to provide not only greater profits to content producers, but greater value to consumers as well. This all comes at the expense of distributors like record labels and licensing organizations like the MPAA and RIAA.

How long distributors and licensors can stand against their eventual irrelevance is anyone’s guess. Even if Bopaboo eventually loses its battle against these behemoths, the resale of used digital media promises to be the record and licensing industries’ long overdue Waterloo.

Brett Trout

Related posts

Posted in Copyright Law. Tagged with , , , , , .

Social Media Accountjacking

Social Networking
Social networking refers to a group of individuals who make connections, or “networks” within the group, typically online. Social networks you might be familiar with include: Twitter , Facebook and MySpace . Social networks develop around commonalities, such as a geographic location or a profession. Some individuals and companies may even monetize their social networks by promoting their goods and services or the goods or services of others. jackhammer

The Cheaters
Given the reach of social networks, and the time and talent it takes to build valuable connections, it is not surprising some social networkers “cheat” by creating social media accounts using the identity of a famous person or company. Certainly adopting a persona like Barack Obama will attract a larger network of followers more quickly than using a name like John Smith . So what do you do if you or your company is the victim of an accountjacker?

Act Quickly
If an accountjacker is using your name to deceive your customers or dilute the distinctiveness of your trademark, time is of the essence. Any delay can translate into the loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars, as well as the loss of customer goodwill you might never recover. While it is importantly to act quickly, it is just as important not act without undertaking a little due diligence first.

Determine Why
Some accountjackers are merely interested in defrauding your customers to make as much money as quickly as possible. Others may actually be fans, or “evangelists,” promoting you or your company. The appropriate initial contact with the accountjacker depends a lot upon which type of accountjacker you have. Coming down too softly on an “unfriendly” accountjacker may bolster them to continue, or even expand their fraud. Conversely, coming down too harshly on a “friendly” accountjacker, especially a particularly powerful evangelist for your product can backfire , leading to a public relations nightmare far greater than the accountjacking.

What Causes of Actions do I Have?
While there are no laws presently address accountjacking specifically, the law provides victims of accountjacking with many types of recourse. The type of recourse available will depend upon the particular venue and actions of the accountjacker. Potential types of redress include:

Continued…

Related posts

Posted in Trademark Law. Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Judges Handing Down Hard Time For CyberCrime

Everyone knows that hacking into an ex-employer’s computer network, shutting down the email system and deleting core files will land you in prison. Federal laws were designed to catch these types of hackers and put them away. But what about you? Have you every violated any of the dozens of federal laws governing computer and Web site misuse? It might surprise you to know, but odds are you have. policeman_cartoon1

Do you carefully read the terms of use on every Web site you visit? Were you aware that violating those terms could result in twenty years in prison and a $1 million fine?

Recently, a federal judge sentenced a television news anchor, caught snooping through his co-anchor’s email, to six months of home confinement, 250 hours of community service and a $5,000 fine. He was also summarily fired from his $700,000/yr job. Selling your company’s confidential information? That may just earn you a ten year all expense paid prison vacation. Sending threatening emails? Up to ten years in prison. Selling impostor watches on eBay? Seventy years. Even if you are acquitted, you may have to fight a costly legal battle a half a continent away.

The bottom line is that federal investigators are cracking down on cybercrime now more than ever before. More importantly, judges are handing down harsher and harsher sentences. Given the huge potential criminal penalties involved with something as seemingly innocuous as violating a Web site’s terms of use, it is well worth educating yourself about the dos and most-certainly-do-nots of cyberlaw.

Brett Trout

Related posts

Posted in Cyber Law. Tagged with , , , .

Lori Drew aquitted of felony charges in MySpace suicide case

After three days of witness testimony in a Los Angeles courtroom, jurors acquitted 49 year old Missouri mother Lori Drew of felony charges under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Drew had been charged with running a phony MySpace page where Drew allegedly adopted the persona of a 16 year old boy. The fictitious boy flirted with Drew’s 13-year-old old neighbor Megan Meier online before eventually rejecting her in a manner which many labeled “cyberbullying.” Meir later committed suicide.

The jury deadlocked on the conspiracy charge and convicted Drew of several misdemeanors. Despite the misdemeanor convictions however, it is unlikely Drew will spend time in custody.

Brett Trout

Related posts

Posted in Internet Law. Tagged with , , .

Do I Need a Patent?

What is a Patent?
A patent is a legal document which allows you to stop other people from making using or selling your invention without paying you a royalty.

What Can I Patent?
While there are special types of patents offering limited protection, such as plant patents and design patents, when people speak of patents, they are typically referring to utility patents. Utility patent protection is available for machines, compositions of matter and methods tied to, or transforming, matter, as well improvements upon any of the foregoing. Patents can not protect ideas, obvious combinations of pre-existing devices, illegal or immoral matter, pure research, or anything that is simply a novelty or curiosity.

How Valuable Are Patents?
The value of a patent depends upon several factors: how valuable is the underlying invention, what similar products are already out there, how skillful was your patent attorney in drafting and prosecuting the patent and how well the inventor markets the invention. A patent is really like a safe deposit box for keeping valuables. Patent can not make inventions better and being awarded a patent, even a broad patent, does not even mean that an invention is valuable. There are thousands of patents on inventions that never enjoyed commercial success. The value of a patent depends upon whether the invention will sell. If the invention will sell like hotcakes at a profitable price, a patent would be very valuable. The fact that the patent prevents competitors from entering the market and driving down the price on a hot selling item, means monopoly profits and/or lucrative licensing agreements for the patent owner.

How Long Does a Patent Last?
Assuming all of the governmental maintenance fees are paid in a timely manner, patents expire 20 years from the date the application for patent was filed. Between the time the application is filed and the date the patent is issued, the patent applicant has no right to stop others from making using or selling the invention.

Continued…

Related posts

Posted in Patent Law. Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Ignite Des Moines Tonight!

Social Networking 2.0
Over the past year, Social Networking has taken the Internet by a storm. In its simplest form, social networking is an online cocktail party revolving around a common theme, interest or medium.  One of the hottest tools for exploiting the benefits of social networking is Twitter. Twitter is a Web site which allows you to write one hundred and forty character micro-blogs, which others can read in a scrolling "feed". Some Twitterers subscribe to Ignite
hundreds of feeds, allowing them to be a part of dozens of simultaneous conversations. Sound confusing? It is actually very simple. Carolyn Elefant of www.myshingle.com, explains it best. Twitter bridges the gap between more passive online networking activities, such as blogging, and more traditional networking activities such as attending a sporting event with a prospective client.

Twitter Des Moines
A group of online entrepreneurs converting virtual conversations into real world handshakes may not seem all that unusual. What is unusual is that nowhere is this happening to a larger proportion of the population than right here in Des Moines. Des Moines "Tweeps" from sixteen to sixty not only share an exponentially expanding online conversation, but they regularly translate the conversation into impromptu real world meetings.

Coworking in the Capital City
One Tweep rising to the top of the local Twitter pack is entrepreneur Daniel Shipton. Shipton is the brains behind Iowa’s first coworking venue, Impromptu Studio. After building an impressive following online — as well as off — Shipton has decided to give a little something back to his community. Tonight, November 6, Shipton and Impromptu Studios will be hosting Ignite Des Moines.   

What is Ignite?
Ignite events revolve around a series of presenters allowed 20 slides and only five minutes to give what at most events would cover an hour or more of presentation time. This affords attendees the opportunity to take in a dozen highly-charged informative talks in the time it would otherwise take to see only one. The densely packed presentations are simultaneously informative and entertaining.

What Else Will I Experience?
In addition to the Ignite presentations, Ignite Des Moines will also include the 2008 Iowa Web Awards presentation by 48 Web, free food and libations, and an egg catapult engineering contest. The entire event is free and wraps up with several "150 second Expert" presentations. These closing presentations involve experts reprising their rapid-fire presentation style, albeit using slides they have never seen before and covering a topic far outside of their own expertise.  As results range from the hilarious to the often embarrassing they are not recommended for the easily offended.   

Most Importantly
While Shipton has gone out of his way to ensure the Ignite Des Moines program rivals that of far larger cities, the real draw is the Ignite community. From artists to entrepreneurs to those just interested in learning more about the vibrant entrepreneurial environment thriving in Greater Des Moines, Ignite Des Moines will draw people of all ages, experiences and backgrounds. The only commonality is that the attendees are all people you should get to know.

See you tonight!

Brett Trout

Related posts

Posted in Uncategorized. Tagged with , , , .

SPU - A Solo Practitioner’s Dream

The Times They Are a Changin’
As little as twenty years ago, starting a solo law practice was tough. Starting a solo practice in a niche area, such as intellectual property, was next to impossible. The huge number of costly resources needed to effectively compete as a solo in a market of 800 pound gorillas, put the dream of law firm ownership effectively out of reach for most lawyers. Over the past two decades, the solo practitioner’s Achilles Heel, reliance on the Internet, has translated into his/her greatest asset. Working at some of the largest and most respected law firms in the state, I was constantly amazed that the number of attorneys who did not even use a computer. Today, effective client representation and fear of computers are becoming mutually exclusive concepts. Not surprisingly it is solo practitioners finding new ways to leverage this technology to most effectively represent their clients.

Power Shift
Over the last decade, there has been a power shift from law firm behemoths to solo practitioners. Formerly, economies of scale placed resources in the hands of large firms which few, if any small firms could justify. These economies of scale more than made up for the inefficiencies associated with big firm bureaucracy. Solo firms, by their very nature, had to be more nimble, constantly adjusting to market demands. Today, many previously prohibitively expensive resources are available online to solo practitioners, often at little or no charge. Having been forced into using online resources from the start, many solo lawyers are, by necessity, more efficient at using them than their large firm counterparts. Additionally, the Internet has allowed solo lawyers to develop strong relationships with other solo practitioners, to a degree rarely seen in the large firm crowd. Solo practitioner now enjoy the best of both worlds. All the best parts of working in a large firm: collegiality, resources and intellectual capital, without all of the soul-sapping bureaucracy.

Bad vs. Good
The recent downturn in the economy has translated into good news and bad news for lawyers. The bad news - Experts predict a drop in law firm profits, cuts in associate bonuses, hiring freezes, layoffs and a generally grim outlook for law firms. The good news - With clients seeking more transparent relationships and more value for their legal budget, these dire predictions targeting large law firms could be a boon to solo practitioners.

Enter Solo Practice University
One of the latest online tools available to the solo practitioner is Solo Practice University™ (SPU). This brainchild of Susan Cartier Liebel of Build a Solo Practice, promises to be practical, timely, fluid, creative, interactive and fun. Unlike many live legal lectures, which all too frequently serve as nothing more than an hour long law firm infomercial, SPU materials are produced by solo practitioners, for solo practitioners. While I would like to believe the SPU faculty (while includes this humble blogger) is SPU’s biggest draw, the real benefit of SPU is its vast community of attorneys sharing insight, solutions and collegiality. If you have never experienced social networking, here is your chance to jump into “professional networking” with both feet. SPU promises to be simple, fun, educational and, if you are not careful, an unparalleled practice builder.

Brett Trout

Related posts

Posted in Uncategorized. Tagged with , , , .

More on Bilski and Business Method Patents

Since yesterday’s post on the future of business method patents, bloggers of all shapes and sizes have been waxing philosophic on the impact of the recent ruling in In re Bilski. Some of the more cogent commentaries from intellectual property lawyers can be found at IP Law & Business, PatentlyO, and The Patent Baristas.

For a more mainstream media take on the Bilski ruling, check out Business Week, The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Techdirt, and Forbes.

There will certainly be lots more to come, but for right now, I am sticking to my guns. I predict that post-Bilski the term “Business Method Patent” will be reserved for accused infringers making pejorative jabs at “naked” business method patents. Business method patent protection will still exist, but only in conjunction with something tangible and/or the transformation of something tangible.

Brett Trout

Related posts

Posted in Patent Law. Tagged with , , , .